MY ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE FLOWERS
My own attitude towards the flowers is the attitude of the so-called
flower-master, or, to speak more exactly, that of the tea-master, because the
former is now troubled by the theories which originally came to exist as a proof
of adoration as if a dew from the burst of dawn. And the latter is the art of
accident, though it may sound- rather arbitrary, born from the proper setting.
When I call the flower-arrangement of the tea-master the natural, I mean to
emphasise the point of formalism in those of the flower-master for which the
word "decorative" is merely an excuse. As you and I know well, the flowers are
sufficiently decorative in nature without adding any emphasis; I think that
"decorative" is one of those two or three words wrongly used in the West when
applied to our Japanese art; and it is my own opinion that the true
decorativeness will never be gained in any art of East or West through the point
of emphasis. The real decorativeness of, for instance, Korin or Hoitsu lies, at
least to our [<161] Japanese mind, in the place where he is least decorative or,
let me say, most natural; the word natural for the Japanese art is verily old
and new'. Now to turn to my attitude in looking at the flowers. I aim it to be
natural, because my mind ever so hates to modify the beauty of the flowers; I
dare say it is a new art (if I can call it so), not only to the West, but also
to the East, which I gained perhaps through my perfect forgetting of the old
Japanese flower art. When I cannot see the way how to explain myself, I always
say: "I seethe real nature in flowers." If you say I admire the selection of the
flowers, you are wrong, because I never select them as it might appear to you;
my chief value as a flower adorer, or mystery, if I have any, is how, and more
important, where, to leave the flowers to sing their own quiet songs in a little
vase, bronze or China, upon the tokonoma.
My mind astrays to the well-known story of Rikiu, the
tea-master, of the sixteenth century, regarding the morning-glory, which Taiko,
the great prince, entreated him to show him; it goes without saying that the
morning-glory was [<162] yet the rarest plant at that time. It is said
that Rikiu had put all the flowers, of course morning-glories, away from the
garden for the fine pebbles and white sand on the appointed day, where Taiko, as
you can imagine, walked most sulkily towards the tea-room, where the great
tea-master prepared the morning tea for his lord. The lord at once questioned
himself where the morning-glory Rikiu promised was planted; but lo! when he
entered the room, just one single morning-glory most winsome and delicate like a
forgotten moonbeam, welcomed him from the tokonoma. Indeed, it was a
great sacrifice for Rikiu to cut off all the other morning-glories; but it was
the heroic way to give the one flower its full distinction. I think that the
other flowers did not die in vain. So it is with my attitude towards the flowers
when I look at them; I do not see the mass of them, and what I see in them,
whether they be a willow or a branch of plums or the petals of lotus or the
crawl of morning-glory, is just a touch or hint of their beauty, and I object to
seeing the rest of them. To call my own way suggestive often leads people to
misunderstanding; [<163] if I have any artistic significance or merit in my
attitude, it is my understanding of how to leave the space in the picture, nay,
the tokonoma where the vase for the flowers stands, or to speak more
poetically, how to cover up the space of that tokonoma with the most graceful
nothing; therefore my tokonoma has no stupid vacancy. You might call it a
Japanese art if you will; but I believe that the true art has no East or West as
it is always born from nowhere.
Next: FAITH
|